case-study-on-POSH-Act

Case Study on POSH Act: I will apologise…but…

Background 

The complainant was terminated from employment at the organization due to downsizing. However, as per her complaint, even though she was getting good feedback from the respondent, who was her manager, she was terminated since she refused the unwanted advances and demands/ requests for sexual favours from him. Post her refusal to give in to his advance, the complainant alleged being singled out in team meetings by respondent and public insult. Respondent also allegedly engaged in unprofessional behaviour with her such as scanning her during video meetings, using abusive language, and contacting her after work hours on WhatsApp for non-work-related reasons. 

The Respondent completely denied all the allegations. He asserted that there were many misconducts on the part of the complainant and the decision to terminate her was a management decision and not his alone. 

The Complainant showed to the IC certain chats containing allegedly inappropriate messages from respondent calling her ‘sexy’. There were no other witness statements or evidence collected since the Complainant opted for conciliation. 

Process Followed 

Complainant initiated conciliation 

Challenges faced by the Internal Committee 

  1. Complaint by an ex-employee 
  • Does the IC have the jurisdiction to handle complaints from individuals who are no longer part of the organization? 
  • Are there any legal or regulatory guidelines that address the handling of complaints from ex-employees? 
  • Is the complaint relevant to events that occurred during the individual’s employment, and does it have ongoing implications for the workplace? 
  1. Delayed responses by complainant 
  • What are the reasons behind the delayed responses from the complainant? 
  • Are there any external factors (e.g., personal issues, lack of access to communication) contributing to the delays, and how can these be addressed? 
  • How can the IC set clear expectations and timelines for responses and actions required from the complainant? 
  • Can the IC provide additional reminders, follow-ups, or flexible timelines to accommodate the complainant’s situation? 
  1. Respondent’s concern around admission of guilt in the process of conciliation 
  • How can the IC clearly communicate the purpose and nature of the conciliation process to the Respondent? 
  • What are the legal implications of any statements or agreements made during the conciliation process for both the Complainant and the Respondent? 

Curious about the answers to the above? Join Us for our full-day Capacity Building Program for Internal Committee Members on the Law against Sexual Harassment at Workplace 

To address these questions and challenges comprehensively, we invite all Internal Committee Members to join the one-day Capacity Building Workshop on the Law Against Sexual Harassment at the Workplace. This workshop will provide in-depth knowledge and practical tools to understand, prevent, and address sexual harassment complaints, ensuring a safer and more respectful work environment for everyone. 

Don’t miss this opportunity to gain valuable insights and skills to navigate complex sexual harassment complaints with professionalism and integrity. Register now to secure your spot! 

Event Details: 

Date: 9th August 2024 

Time: 10AM to 5PM 

Location: MS Teams 

Registration Link: https://poshatwork.com/product/full-day-ic-training/ 

Tags: No tags

Comments are closed.